Google Forms is free, fast, and genuinely good at collecting answers. The case for a Google Forms alternative starts when the answers have to hold up: programmed logic, quotas, weighting, significance testing, and respondents you can trust. Wavefield builds that study from your brief and fields it for $99 to $299 per project.
From $99 per project · Also comparing Wavefield vs. SurveyMonkey and Wavefield vs. Qualtrics
Forms covers the basics well: Google's own feature list includes question types, templates, answer-based section branching, and a raw export to Sheets. The honest comparison is everything a study needs around those basics: who answers, what stops a lopsided sample, and whether the numbers survive scrutiny.
Swipe the table sideways to see all columns →
| Google Forms | Wavefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free with a personal Google account; business controls come with a Workspace plan | Free to build and preview; $99 to $299 per project to field. Published pricing, no seats. |
| Questionnaire programming | You build every question and every branch by hand in the editor | Upload a brief or Word doc: the AI agent programs the questions, logic, quotas, and rotations |
| Logic | Go-to-section branching keyed to multiple choice answers | Skip and display rules on any answer, piping, randomization, rotations, quota control |
| Respondents | You distribute a link to people you can already reach | Email and SMS invites to your list, or panel sample sourced for you at $3.50 per quality-checked complete |
| Data quality | Every submission counts; there is no fraud or quality screening | Speeders, straight-liners, duplicate devices, and gibberish open ends flagged for review |
| Analysis and exports | Response summary charts and a raw export to Google Sheets | Weighted crosstabs with significance letters, toplines, SPSS and Excel banner book exports |
The last two rows are where Forms studies usually fall apart. AAPOR's best practices call for monitoring quality during collection and transparency about weighting. Forms leaves both entirely to you; Wavefield builds both into every project, with sample size planned up front.
Nothing stops 300 of your 400 responses coming from one age group or one department. Without quotas during fielding, you find out after the money is spent.
A shared Forms link travels. Bots, repeat submitters, and people racing through for the gift card all land in the same Sheet, indistinguishable from real answers.
Section branching handles a simple screener. Rotations, piping, display rules keyed to multiple answers, and terminate-with-quota logic are past the ceiling.
Counts and percentages come free. Weighting the skew out, testing whether 46 percent differs from 52, and building banner tables all become your manual Sheets project.
Picking an alternative for Google Forms starts with why you are leaving, because the alternatives live in different aisles. If Forms looks too plain or hits a feature wall, Tally and Fillout are the usual picks when people want a free Google Forms alternative: modern editors, generous free plans, still form builders at heart. If you need signatures, payments, and approval workflows, that is Jotform's aisle, and Microsoft Forms wins inside Microsoft 365 shops. If you are leaving Google on principle, self-hosted open-source tools like Formbricks fit that reason better than any hosted platform, ours included. And if the survey itself outgrew Forms, you are shopping for a research platform, which is the aisle below.
One warning from the forum threads where this question gets asked weekly: the best Google Forms alternative threads on Reddit and Quora mix all four aisles into one list, so a privacy tool sits next to an enterprise platform as if they solved the same problem, which they do not. A form builder replaces the editor. A research platform replaces the editor, the respondent hunt, the quality screening, and the analysis. Price the whole job, and the comparison gets much simpler.
Swipe the table sideways to see all columns →
| Wavefield | Google Forms | Tally | Jotform | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | $99-$299 per project, no subscription | Free; Workspace plans for business controls | Free core product; Pro around $29/mo | Free tier with limits; paid plans from ~$34/mo |
| Built for | One research study at a time, done to a defensible standard | Quick forms, quizzes, and internal surveys | Modern forms with an unusually generous free plan | Form workflows: payments, signatures, approvals |
| Logic and quotas | Full survey logic plus quotas, rotations, piping | Section branching | Conditional logic and calculations | Conditional logic and calculations |
| Respondents | Panel sample at $3.50 per complete, or your own list | Bring your own | Bring your own | Bring your own |
| Research analysis | Weighting, significance letters, SPSS and banner exports | Charts and a Sheets export | Basic results and CSV export | Reports and exports; no weighting |
Competitor figures are commonly reported ranges as of late 2026; check live pricing before committing. For the research aisle in one table, see online survey platforms, compared, and for the wider landscape by kind, from field apps to trackers, see data collection tools.
Most people typing create google survey online into a search box want the free thing, and the free thing is fine. We would rather hand you the four steps than pretend a paid platform is the answer to a question it was not asked.
Go to forms.google.com and pick Blank or a template. The same steps create a Google questionnaire with sections if you add them from the toolbar.
The plus icon adds a question; the dropdown sets its type. Toggle Required on anything respondents must answer, and add Go to section rules for simple branching.
Under Settings you can collect email addresses, limit respondents to one response each, and shuffle question order. That is the whole quality toolkit.
Send shares by email, link, or embed. The Responses tab charts answers in real time, and Link to Sheets exports the raw rows for your own analysis.
What the free path does not include: quota control while responses come in, any screening of who is answering, and any statistics beyond counts and percentages. For an event RSVP none of that matters. For a study, it is the whole job, which is why the collection method and the analysis plan deserve more thought than the form editor.
The phrase google survey software usually means one of two products. The first is Google Forms, the free builder above, alive and well. The second is Google Surveys, the paid product where you wrote a few questions and Google found the respondents. Google's sunset notice is blunt: Google Surveys and Surveys 360 have not been available since November 1, 2022.
That retirement explains a lot of frustrated searching. The google survey maker people remember from a few years back, the one that delivered answers from real consumers overnight, is gone, and Forms never did that job. What replaced it is the research platform model: you program the questionnaire, the platform sources respondents from managed panels, and quality checks filter what comes back.
On Wavefield that whole loop is one project. The agent programs the study from your brief, panel sample costs $3.50 per quality-checked complete, quotas keep the sample in shape while it fields, and the report comes back weighted with significance letters. It is the closest thing to what Google Surveys promised, with the questionnaire depth Google Surveys never had; it capped you at a handful of questions, while a Wavefield study runs full survey logic end to end.
The split is not a migration. Teams that use both keep Forms for the weekly pulse checks and sign-up sheets it is perfect at, and open a Wavefield project the three or four times a year a question actually carries budget: a pricing study, a brand tracker wave, a concept test before a launch. Per-project pricing exists precisely so the second category does not require a subscription to sit idle between studies.
Better at what is the real question. For nicer-looking forms with fewer limits, Tally and Fillout are better and still free. For workflows like signatures and approvals, Jotform is better. For surveys that are actually research, with programmed logic, quotas, weighting, and sourced respondents, a research platform like Wavefield is better. Forms itself remains hard to beat for quick, free, internal questionnaires.
Tally is the usual answer, with unlimited forms and responses on its free plan, and Fillout is close behind with 1,000 responses a month free. Both are form builders, so you gain design and flexibility, not research features. No free tool sources respondents or weights data; real sample costs money on every platform, which is why free alternatives make sense only when your complaint is the form, not the research.
It depends on the data. For offline field collection on phones and tablets, open-source tools like ODK Collect are built for exactly that job. For customer and market research data that must survive scrutiny, use a survey platform with quotas, quality flags, and weighting. For intake forms feeding a database or CRM, Fillout and Jotform integrate most deeply. Our map of data collection tools sorts the whole landscape by kind.
Google retired it. Google Surveys and Surveys 360, the paid products where Google found respondents to answer your questions, have been unavailable since November 1, 2022, per Google's own sunset notice. Google Forms is unaffected and still free. If you came looking for the find-me-respondents part, that job now belongs to research platforms that sell panel sample, which is what Wavefield's $3.50 per complete covers.
No. Forms has no quota control, so nothing stops your sample from ending up 70 percent one group. It has no weighting, so you cannot correct that skew afterward, and no significance testing, so differences between groups are eyeballed rather than tested. You can export to Sheets and build all three by hand if you have the statistical background, but at that point you are writing the research platform yourself.
For a class exercise or a small pilot, yes, and it costs nothing. For research someone will act on, the gaps show quickly: no quota control during fielding, no respondent sourcing, no fraud screening, and no weighting or significance machinery at analysis. AAPOR's best practices call for monitoring data quality during collection and being transparent about weighting; Forms gives you no tooling for either.
Yes, and you do not have to retype it. Paste your questions into a document, or export them however is convenient, and upload that to Wavefield. The agent programs the study from it, adding the logic, quotas, and rotations the original form could not express. Most imported forms come out tighter than they went in, because the agent asks about screening and termination rules Forms never prompted you to define.
Because Forms sells Workspace and collects answers; it does not promise the answers mean anything. What you pay a research platform for is everything around the questionnaire: respondents sourced and screened, quotas enforced while fielding, fraud flagged, data weighted, and differences tested. Those have real costs, sample above all. A platform that offers them free is either not offering them, or charging you somewhere less visible.
Related reading: data collection tools, by kind, online survey platforms, sample size calculator, and survey data collection methods.
Upload a brief, let the agent program the logic and quotas, field with quality-checked sample, and get weighted, tested results. $99 to $299 per project.
Build a survey free